Mesh implant review @ tortlawteam.com #meshimplant #vaginalmeshimplant

Free Consultation

First Name

Last Name

Phone

Email

Address

Address 2

City

State

Zip Code

Did you have a Bladder Sling or Trans Vaginal Mesh Surgery?
YesNo
Was the original surgery done Vaginally
YesNo
Was there a revision (replaced or removed) surgery
YesNo
Are you currently represented by an attorney?
10
Comments

Was the Revision Surgery performed Vaginally?
YesNo
Was the Revision surgery performed while you were under Anesthesia?
YesNo
Was this original Bladder Sling or Transvaginal Mesh Surgery performed in 2005 or after?
YesNo
Was the reason you had received the initial Mesh Implant Surgery?
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)"Other (please explain in the details part of this form)
Was the Revision Surgery performed in 2005 or later?
YesNo

meshsurgery#vaginalmesh #bladdersling #tvm #bss #vaginalmeshsurgery #bladderslingsurgery #meshsurgery #revisionsurgery #bloodclots #stroke #bleeding #deepveinthrombosis #dvt #heartattack #pulmonaryembolism #drug #medicine #surgery #pe #claims #lawsuit @tortlawteam.com

 Mesh Implant Review

A retired public health director will lead an urgent review into how many women have suffered serious side effects after undergoing mesh implant surgery.

Health Secretary Alex Neil announced Dr Lesley Wilkie would head up the independent review.

He also confirmed to MSPs that all health boards in Scotland have now been contacted to ask them to suspend the routine use of the implants.

Transvaginal tapes and meshes are used in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, with an estimated 1,850 women having the surgery each year in Scotland.

For most patients the implant is effective but a number of women have come forward after experiencing abdominal and pelvic pain, urinary problems, painful intercourse, vaginal scarring and the need for further operations.

Mr Neil said while many women had no problems afterwards, “there is growing concern about the number of women experiencing complications, linked with under-reporting of adverse effects and a poor understanding of why these complications have occurred”.

He told MSPs: “I do not believe we know the real incidence of adverse events in relation to these procedures.”

He said he had asked for the independent review to be “set up urgently to report on the issues raised, such as complication rates and under-reporting, which have become a growing concern”.

Labour’s Neil Findlay said the “belated action” came after a “year of dithering” from the Health Secretary.

Mr Findlay said: “Almost a year ago, in rejecting a call for the suspension of mesh, the cabinet secretary claimed he had no power to act and he could not act because he feared litigation by the manufacturers.

“He also claimed at that time the number of women who had experienced problems with mesh was very low. So, how many women have had complications?”

Mr Neil said the review would “establish the facts and report at the beginning of 2015, taking account of the European Commission study of these devices due in January”.

He stated: “The review will look at synthetic implant procedures for both stress urinary incontinence and for pelvic organ prolapse

“I can announce today that Dr Leslie Wilkie, a retired director of public health, will lead the independent review. The review will start next month and report early in 2015.

“The key priority for this review is to establish the facts concerning the number of women experiencing complications and the issue of under-reporting for adverse effects.”

He paid tribute to the women who had raised the issue with politicians, saying he had “deeply troubled” when he met them and “heard of the horrendous complications they have suffered, in some cases altering their lives forever”.

He said Dr Wilkie would consult these women prior to establishing the final remit for the review.

“I gave an undertaking that the women would be consulted and I intend to keep to that undertaking,” Mr Neil said.